428 vs 520 chain

They look similar, but they don’t share sprockets. Here’s what differs and when switching makes sense.

428520
Pitch½" (12.7 mm)⅝" (15.875 mm)
Inner width5/16" (7.94 mm)¼" (6.35 mm)
Roller diameter0.335" (8.51 mm)0.400" (10.16 mm)
Typical engines110–250cc pit bikes, trail bikes and small ATVs250cc+ dirt bikes, most sport ATVs

The key difference

The 520 has a longer pitch and bigger rollers, so for the same ratio each link and roller carries its load over a larger area, which is why 520 is used once engines get bigger. Oddly, the 520 is narrower inside than the 428 – the “20” and “28” describe width, and the 520’s strength comes from its bigger pitch and rollers.

Why people convert 428 to 520

What a conversion involves

Both sprockets and the chain change together – nothing carries over. Check that the front sprocket with the right spline exists in 520, that the chain clears the swingarm and guard (rollers are bigger), and recalculate the chain length, because a ⅝" pitch needs fewer links for the same distance.

For a stock 110–125cc engine, a good-quality 428 chain is plenty. Converting only makes sense when the power or the parts situation demands it.

Frequently asked questions

Can a 520 chain run on 428 sprockets?
No. The pitch is different (⅝" vs ½"), so the rollers won’t sit in the teeth.
Is 520 stronger than 428?
Generally yes for chains of the same quality grade, thanks to the bigger pitch and rollers – but a quality 428 is fine for most engines up to about 250cc.

Last updated